Click here to download text and video materials for the full course. History 119b/Af-Am 172 | The Civil War and Reconstruction Era, 1845-1877 ![]() D and writing a dissertation that becomes a book, is it more important to write a paradigm-changing work, or is it more important to tell a good story? How do we do both? What is this thing called the past? How do we organize historical knowledge? How do we seek and find historical “truth?” Are we excavators in archives or imaginative writers with lots of footnotes? How can we be both? What does it mean to have an historical imagination or a sense of history? What is the role of curiosity in historical work? When do you find interpretations securely behind their sources, and when do they seem to be floating ahead of the evidence? Are interpretations creatures of timing, of shifts in the Zeitgeist? When are a historian’s assumptions altogether too obvious and controlling, and when are they subtle and brilliantly employed? What is good history? If any of these kinds of questions, as well as many others, emerge each week I will be delighted. But I am also very much interested in exploring the nature of our craft as historians. Now and then, we will attempt to read two books per week to show a contrast in styles or interpretations of a similar topic. Each week’s reading will include some recommended works that students will be encouraged to consult now or over time. This course is designed as a reading seminar to help prepare students for their ultimate oral exams, and hence the stress on historiography. To begin the course, we will read a few brief classic essays on the nature of history and the craft of writing history. In each week we will look for the tensions between narrative and analytical history, as well as the ways in which race and gender in particular have reshaped research and interpretive agendas in recent years. ![]() ![]() This graduate readings course will explore recent trends and historiography on several problems through most of the 19th century: sectionalism expansion slavery and the Old South northern society and reform movements women, gender and labor Civil War causation the Civil War as a community and individual experience the Civil War in the popular imagination the relationships between military-political and social-cultural history Reconstruction as a synthesis and historiographical battleground. Yale University | Spring semester, 201 | Wednesday, 1:30-3:20 pm, 81 Wall St. Blight carefully avoids grinding axes as he makes his argument, which taken as a whole helps to explain why America today continues to wrestle with the seemingly endless and divisive issue of race…Here is a powerful book, artfully written by a scholar of learned poise who believes that by knowing the past we might better know ourselves.Įrfordert eine Authentifizierung Nicht lizenziertħ.History 715 | Readings in Nineteenth Century America, 1815-1880s After Reconstruction, Northerners and Southerners alike took hold of a ‘Lost Cause’ ideology that showed pity toward the South in its defeat, accepted Jim Crow policies that deprived blacks of their civil rights, and pushed for policies and practices that would ensure white supremacy across the land. ![]() Reunification became a joyful event, but it came at a steep price. Less consciously, they and their fellow Americans found this new narrative-this rewriting of history based on a kind of historical amnesia-comforting and restorative. Deeply researched and carefully crafted study argues that after the war white veterans, Union and Confederate, facilitated the reconciliation of the two sections by consciously avoiding the fact that slavery had brought on the sectional conflict, choosing instead to celebrate the courage that they and their comrades had brandished in battle.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |